DOC News Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
FEEDBACK EDITORIAL BOARD ABOUT DOC NEWS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOC News    January 1, 2005
Volume 2 Number 1 p. 11
© 2005 American Diabetes Association

Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldfarb, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Goldfarb, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Self-Monitoring May Help Patients with Non–Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes

Bruce Goldfarb

People with type 2 diabetes who aren't dependent on insulin may still benefit from regular at-home use of blood glucose monitoring, according to a recently reported meta-analysis.

When part of a multi-component diabetes management regimen, self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) results in almost twice the reduction in glycated hemoglobin (A1C) compared with levels for patients on a regimen that doesn't include SMBG, according to Nemencio A. Nicodemus, Jr., MD, and colleagues at the University of the Philippines and Manila-based Applied Research Consultancy, Inc.

"We found an additional 45% reduction in A1C from self-monitoring," says Nicodemus, who presented the group's findings at the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) Scientific Assembly held in Orlando, Fla.

Although SMBG is usually practiced by patients with diabetes who require insulin, some, including the American Diabetes Association, suggest that self-monitoring ought to be a useful guide for those who manage their disease with diet, exercise, and oral hypoglycemic agents.

A smattering of studies suggest that SMBG is associated with better glycemic control, but "one prior meta-analysis showed no benefit," explains Nicodemus. "We were puzzled by that."1

The group conducted a meta-analysis of its own, searching databases and the literature to find eight randomized, controlled clinical trials on adult patients with non–insulin-treated type 2 diabetes that compared A1C reduction with and without SMBG.

The eight trials comprised a total of 1,307 patients. Although the self-monitoring strategies ranged in frequency from 3 to 12 times per week, the authors say that heterogeneity among the studies was not statistically significant.

SMBG by itself does not improve glycemic control, but works best as part of multi-component diabetes management, says epidemiologist and statistician Jesus N. Sarol, Jr., lead investigator of the meta-analysis.

Sarol says that it's too soon to recommend SMBG to patients not using insulin. "Personally, I would like to see more studies specifically on cost-benefit and optimal strategies for self-monitoring," he says. {blacksquare}

References

    1. Coster S, Gulliford MC, Seed PT, Powrie JK, Swaminathan R: Self-monitoring in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. Diabet Med 17:755–761, 2000.[Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldfarb, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Goldfarb, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
FEEDBACK EDITORIAL BOARD ABOUT DOC NEWS
DOC News Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum