DOC News Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
FEEDBACK EDITORIAL BOARD ABOUT DOC NEWS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOC News    October 1, 2005
Volume 2 Number 10 p. 10
© 2005 American Diabetes Association

Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Finding the Best Obesity Measure for Heart-Disease Risk

Waist-to-height ratio may be better than BMI

A group of German researchers reports that the ratio of waist circumference to tallness is the measure that stands above all others in terms of indicating obesity-related cardiovascular risk.

Overweight and obesity are widely recognized as risks for cardiovascular disease, along with a variety of comorbidities. There are a number of methods for measuring body size, some invested with more importance than others, and all with their proponents and detractors.

Body mass index (BMI) has been established as one standard measure of overweight and obesity. In recent years, waist circumference has emerged as a useful tool to assess the distribution of body weight, a measurement that some experts say is more sensitive to central or abdominal obesity.

The measurement of waist-to-tallness ratio (WTR) "is simple and the most reliable predictor of cardiovascular risk in primary care," says endocrinology fellow Harald Schneider, MD, who presented the results of the German study at the annual meeting of The Endocrine Society in June in San Diego. He suggests its regular use in primary care.

The investigators, from Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry in Munich and the University of Dresden, conducted a clinical epidemiological study of 48,353 middle-aged primary care patients enrolled in the Diabetes Cardiovascular Risk-Evaluation: Targets and Essential Data for Commitment of Treatment (DETECT) Study. The group evaluated the predictive value of BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and WTR.

Male participants were 35–54 years of age, while females were 55–64 years. "This is the age group where you'd expect to see cardiovascular disease," Schneider says.

All patients completed a standardized clinical and laboratory assessment by their primary care physician, including diagnostic screening measures and a questionnaire for patients. A sampling of 7,519 patients had more extensive testing and was followed for a 12-month period.

Of all the body-size measures, WTR was the most sensitive to "over-all cardiovascular disease risk" in both men and women, followed by waist circumference and BMI, Schneider says. Analysis revealed a cut-off point of 0.53 for women and 0.55 for men. {blacksquare}


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
FEEDBACK EDITORIAL BOARD ABOUT DOC NEWS
DOC News Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum