DOC News Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
FEEDBACK EDITORIAL BOARD ABOUT DOC NEWS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOC News    July 1, 2005
Volume 2 Number 7 p. 14
© 2005 American Diabetes Association

Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Fat Distribution May Make a Difference

Is one body shape more of a health risk than another? A group ofinvestigators recently reported a study in Archives of InternalMedicine supporting the hypothesis that metabolic syndrome is related todistribution of fat in thebody.

Metabolic syndrome—a cluster of symptoms including hypertension,insulin resistance, high serum triglycerides and HDL cholesterol, and largewaist size—has a known link to obesity. But previous studies of waistcircumference typically have not distinguished between subcutaneous fat andfat within the viscera.

The research involved computed tomography that was performed on 3,035 maleand female volunteers ranging in age from 70 to 79 years to determine how fatis distributed on the body of each person. Through CAT scans, investigatorswere able to determine precisely the amounts of visceral, abdominalsubcutaneous, intermuscular, and subcutaneous thigh fat.

Overall, 39% of participants had metabolic syndrome, which was more commonin the obese than in normal-weight or overweight people. Researchers foundimportant differences in the risk of metabolic syndrome, depending on how fatis distributed in the body.

Data showed that metabolic syndrome was associated with visceral fat amongnormal-weight, overweight, and obese participants. Metabolic syndrome was twoto three times more likely to present in those with visceral fat in everyweight category. Abdominal subcutaneous fat was linked to metabolic syndromeonly among men of normal weight. Intermuscular fat raised the risk ofmetabolic syndrome among normal-weight and overweight men. In contrast,subcutaneous fat in the thigh area was inversely associated with metabolicsyndrome.

Clearly, the association between body fat and metabolic syndrome is complexand involves more than mere obesity. In fact, according to researchers, obesewomen without metabolic syndrome had a higher proportion of body fat thanthose with the condition.

Clinicians should not make quick judgments about patients' risk ofmetabolic syndrome based on weight or body mass index (BMI), researcherscaution.

Goodpaster BH, Krishnaswami S, Harris TB, et al.: Obesity,regional body fat distribution, and the metabolic syndrome in older men andwomen. Arch Intern Med 165:777–783, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Improper defenition of Metabolic Syndrome
Janardhanan S Kumar
DOC News Online, 7 Sep 2005 [Full text]

Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
FEEDBACK EDITORIAL BOARD ABOUT DOC NEWS
DOC News Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum