DOC News Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
FEEDBACK EDITORIAL BOARD ABOUT DOC NEWS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOC News    December 1, 2007
Volume 4 Number 12 p. 5
© 2007 American Diabetes Association

Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keegan, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Keegan, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Weak Sales Lead to Exubera's Market Withdrawal

Pfizer pulls the first pulmonary insulin, but others are in the works

Andrew Keegan

When the first inhalable insulin, Exubera, was approved for use by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in January 2006, many anticipated that the product would revolutionize diabetes care by offering an alternative to insulin injections. But less than 2 years later, after sales paled in comparison to the billion-dollar payoff the company had been expecting, manufacturer Pfizer Inc. is taking Exubera off the market.

An October 18 statement from the company's chief medical officer, Joseph Feczko, MD, attributes this step to the fact that "too few patients are taking Exubera" and that other glucose-lowering alternatives exist. Pfizer says that the decision was not the result of any safety concerns and that the drug will remain available into January, to enable adequate time for those taking it to talk with their doctors about treatment options.

Why did a product with so much potential—and so many research dollars behind it—fail? The short answer is that neither people with diabetes nor care providers embraced the technology. Some resisted Exubera's bulky delivery system. Others may have had safety concerns: Exubera was found to cause a slight decline in lung capacity during the first 3 months of use (DOC News, September 2007, page 1). Lung tests were required before initiating Exubera, with further tests recommended after the first 6 months of therapy. The inconvenience and expense of this additional testing may have further slowed acceptance of this product.

Furthermore, recent advances in needle technology that have made insulin injections much less onerous and virtually painless further reduced the demand for an inhaled product. Exubera also was more expensive than injected insulin. Finally, because Exubera was a rapid-acting mealtime insulin, people who use longer-acting insulins still were required to inject as part of their routine.

Exubera was the only inhalable insulin on the market, but other companies are developing their own versions. Eli Lilly's AIR Insulin System, Mann-Kind's inhaled Technosphere Insulin, and Novo Nordisk's AERx insulin Diabetes Management System are three such examples; all are in Phase III trials. It's not known what effect, if any, Exubera's failure will have on the development of these products. {blacksquare}


Figure 1


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keegan, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Keegan, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
FEEDBACK EDITORIAL BOARD ABOUT DOC NEWS
DOC News Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum